問題詳情
IV. Discourse
Section A
After decades of operating with impunity as one of the most powerful men in entertainment, Harvey Weinstein has been brought down by a flood of chilling sexual harassment and assault claims, more of which may yet come to light. Power seems to have been his noxious aphrodisiac. Power was why some women acceded and others clammed up, why his employees helped facilitate his assaults and why so many in Hollywood looked the other way for decades. Power was the means, the motive, and the cover-up. ___(30)__
Weinstein spent decades building his fiefdom on the grounds of a pervasive “see something, say nothing" culture of capitulation. But at the same time, and apparently beyond his view, women were inching their way toward greater social, political and professional power. ___(31)_. In the rubble of Weinstein's empire, we find artifacts divulging so much about our values, our culture and ourselves. The story they tell is one of stunning hypocrisy and of the slow grind of earth shifting beneath us.
Still, power differentials matter. Overt harassment may be increasingly kept in check, but sexual coercion and abuse have not been eradicated. They are simply more likely to be hidden from plain view—in an office with the door closed, in the corner of a company party, at what was supposed to be a working dinner, in a room at the Peninsula Beverly Hills hotel. It's no coincidence that harassment and even assault were pushed undercover at the same time more and more women entered previously male-dominated fields, rose to prominence and gained power in their own right.__(32)___. But only slightly. Across industries, there are still men so powerful, they seem untouchable.
Each of these high-profile cases echoes the last and accelerates the next. Toppling the first few titans was a heavy lift, and while it's still not easy, each successive predator seems to fall that much faster. Feminists have succeeded in getting sexual harassment and assault taken seriously enough to be career-ending. _(33)_. With each of these stories, you canimagine the newsroom dictates: Find the next Weinstein. At the same time, you hear women whisper: Should I speak out about my own Weinstein?
_(34)__. But since the story broke, everything was exposed under the sun. There has been a collective exhale among the women who finally spoke out. In the New Yorker, writer Ronan Farrow detailed additional accusations, including rape, and described the well-staffed machine that deceived young women into spending time alone with a man everyone knew was a predator. Weinstein was not a solo operator, and now his vast network of enablers is also falling under the scrutiny of the entertainers, journalists and activists who expect heads to roll. Amid the wave of allegations and outcry from other Hollywood luminaries, Weinstein was fired. The Weinstein Company's all-male board was divided on his fate. Within 48 hours, four board members had resigned.
Every woman knows these men. We've worked for them, loved them, married them, and raised them. We've watched their movies and read their books and cast ballots checking their names. Every woman also knows the pretty good men who aren't predators, but who intentionally or tacitly create the conditions for the predation, degradation or even just marginalization of women: the men who make up all-male boards and executive leadership, who don't want to create discomfort by challenging sexism from friends or co-workers, who hire and mentor and promote younger men, who go silent on "women's issues.” We are often quick to absolve them, and how could we not? _(35) . The men are supposed to be on our side, though—these men are the ones who break our hearts.
(AB) News organizations increasingly recognize that breaking these stories benefits both theirreputations and their bottom line—the first to get there sets the media narrative for days orweeks.
(AC) How fitting that it is their voices breaking the silence and shattering Hollywood's glasshouses. (AD) With more women in the room, and a few at the top, male workplace norms began tocrack.
(AE) And power is exactly what he has lost, in a downfall that spans two coasts, severalindustries and dozens of klieg-lit names. (BC) This growing cacophony of mostly female voices no doubt has the remaining Weinsteinof the world holding their breath.
(BD) Severing our ties with all of these men would require self-banishment to a remote cave, orat least expatriation to a radical commune.
30.
Section A
After decades of operating with impunity as one of the most powerful men in entertainment, Harvey Weinstein has been brought down by a flood of chilling sexual harassment and assault claims, more of which may yet come to light. Power seems to have been his noxious aphrodisiac. Power was why some women acceded and others clammed up, why his employees helped facilitate his assaults and why so many in Hollywood looked the other way for decades. Power was the means, the motive, and the cover-up. ___(30)__
Weinstein spent decades building his fiefdom on the grounds of a pervasive “see something, say nothing" culture of capitulation. But at the same time, and apparently beyond his view, women were inching their way toward greater social, political and professional power. ___(31)_. In the rubble of Weinstein's empire, we find artifacts divulging so much about our values, our culture and ourselves. The story they tell is one of stunning hypocrisy and of the slow grind of earth shifting beneath us.
Still, power differentials matter. Overt harassment may be increasingly kept in check, but sexual coercion and abuse have not been eradicated. They are simply more likely to be hidden from plain view—in an office with the door closed, in the corner of a company party, at what was supposed to be a working dinner, in a room at the Peninsula Beverly Hills hotel. It's no coincidence that harassment and even assault were pushed undercover at the same time more and more women entered previously male-dominated fields, rose to prominence and gained power in their own right.__(32)___. But only slightly. Across industries, there are still men so powerful, they seem untouchable.
Each of these high-profile cases echoes the last and accelerates the next. Toppling the first few titans was a heavy lift, and while it's still not easy, each successive predator seems to fall that much faster. Feminists have succeeded in getting sexual harassment and assault taken seriously enough to be career-ending. _(33)_. With each of these stories, you canimagine the newsroom dictates: Find the next Weinstein. At the same time, you hear women whisper: Should I speak out about my own Weinstein?
_(34)__. But since the story broke, everything was exposed under the sun. There has been a collective exhale among the women who finally spoke out. In the New Yorker, writer Ronan Farrow detailed additional accusations, including rape, and described the well-staffed machine that deceived young women into spending time alone with a man everyone knew was a predator. Weinstein was not a solo operator, and now his vast network of enablers is also falling under the scrutiny of the entertainers, journalists and activists who expect heads to roll. Amid the wave of allegations and outcry from other Hollywood luminaries, Weinstein was fired. The Weinstein Company's all-male board was divided on his fate. Within 48 hours, four board members had resigned.
Every woman knows these men. We've worked for them, loved them, married them, and raised them. We've watched their movies and read their books and cast ballots checking their names. Every woman also knows the pretty good men who aren't predators, but who intentionally or tacitly create the conditions for the predation, degradation or even just marginalization of women: the men who make up all-male boards and executive leadership, who don't want to create discomfort by challenging sexism from friends or co-workers, who hire and mentor and promote younger men, who go silent on "women's issues.” We are often quick to absolve them, and how could we not? _(35) . The men are supposed to be on our side, though—these men are the ones who break our hearts.
(AB) News organizations increasingly recognize that breaking these stories benefits both theirreputations and their bottom line—the first to get there sets the media narrative for days orweeks.
(AC) How fitting that it is their voices breaking the silence and shattering Hollywood's glasshouses. (AD) With more women in the room, and a few at the top, male workplace norms began tocrack.
(AE) And power is exactly what he has lost, in a downfall that spans two coasts, severalindustries and dozens of klieg-lit names. (BC) This growing cacophony of mostly female voices no doubt has the remaining Weinsteinof the world holding their breath.
(BD) Severing our ties with all of these men would require self-banishment to a remote cave, orat least expatriation to a radical commune.
30.
參考答案
無參考答案
內容推薦
- 兩個電阻之電阻值為 R1及 R2(R1>R2);若單獨、並聯及串聯使用,可得 16 歐姆;則 之值為何? (A) (B) 2 (C) 3(D) 。
- 如下圖所示,在木板上以鐵釘固定甲、乙、丙三條鋼絲,假設三條鋼絲的鬆緊度相同,已知乙最粗,甲、丙一樣細,乙、丙兩條鋼絲一樣長。當撥動這三條鋼絲時,下列有關音調的高低順序,何者正確? (A)甲>丙>
- 【題組】(A) gauged(B) reiterated (C) encumbered(D) underscored
- 【題組】(A) As a result(B) Conversely (C) Instead(D) In the other
- 在民主國家中,人民有權利監督政府的課稅是否公平 、稅收的運用是否有效率,而下列關於我國的體制運作,哪個敘述錯誤? (A)在野黨監督政府收支 (B)各級行政部門提出預算後,由各級民意代表審查 (
- 【題組】(A) unruly(B) burgeoning (C) susceptible(D) reflexive
- 【題組】(A) practical training(B) enigmatic ideas (C) the unexpected(D) the indeterminable
- 地方政府推動自治工作時,需要許多經費,下列是永靖鄉長候選人對增闢地方財源的主張,其中何人的主張屬於「中央撥款」的範疇? (A)素素:我將利用本地花卉產業規畫花卉博覽會。 (B)世華:我將竭力爭
- 【題組】(A) stifling (B) to stifle (C) surmising (D) to surmise
- 【題組】(A) and (B) x (C) that (D)where
內容推薦
- 甲物質在定壓下有固定的沸點,加熱後會產生固體產物,並釋出氣體,則甲物質屬於下列何者? (A)元素 (B)混合物 (C)化合物 (D)以上皆有可能。
- 用酒精燈加熱 30 公克的水,使水從 20℃升高至 60℃,酒精燈提供給水多少卡的熱量?(A)1200 (B)1600 (C)2000 (D)2400。
- 用酒精燈加熱 30 公克的水,使水從 20℃升高至 60℃,酒精燈提供給水多少卡的熱量?【題組】承 19 題,如果酒精的比熱為 0.6 卡/(公克.℃),則相同熱量能使 400 公克的
- Section B Genetic engineering on a planetary used to be the stuff of science fiction dreams
- V. Grammar Sixty miles north of Guam and more than 1,700 feet under the ocean's surface
- 【題組】Which choice most effectively sets up the information in the next sentence?(A) NO CHANGE (B)
- 將固體物質加熱,其內部的分子與原子之振動振幅會如何改變? (A)變大 (B)變小 (C)不變 (D)轉向 (E)先變大轉而變小
- 下列有關太陽的輻射能描述,何者錯誤? (A)釋出能量的反應式與地球上的核能發電相同 (B)在很高的溫度下進行 (C)在很高的壓力下進行 (D)輻射能中有許多頻率不相等的電磁波 (E)輻射能中有許
- 下列哪一種元素是一般核能發電廠發電所使用的燃料? (A)鈽(B)鈾(C)鈾(D)鐳(E)鉛207
- 【題組】The writer is considering revising the underlined portion to the following: dioxide, which
- VI. Reading Comprehension Section A In the 1970s, two debates engaged many scholars of earl
- 【題組】The passage suggests which of the following about the women's historiansmentioned in th
- 一輛汽車在一直線道路上運動,其速度與時間關係如下圖所示,在 0~8 秒間,汽車的位移為多少公尺? (A) -3 (B) 6 (C) 9 (D) 15 。
- 【題組】(A) NO CHANGE(B) world's oceans' (C) world's oceans(D) worlds oceans
- 【題組】According to the passage, historical studies of race and slavery in early Americathat were p
- Section B Passage 1 is adapted from Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, Volume Or
- 【題組】(A) NO CHANGE(B) those of stomach (C) the acid from stomach (D) stomach
- 【題組】In Passage 2, Mill most strongly suggests that gender roles are resistant to changebecause t
- 【題組】Which choice best describes the ways that the two authors conceive of theindividual's p
- 【題組】Which choice best describes a central difference between how Beveridge (Passage 1) and Bryan
- 【題組】It can reasonably be inferred from Passage 2 that Bryan considers the preference for nationa
- 【題組】It can most reasonably be inferred from Passage 2 that Bryan would criticize thevision of Am
- Section C Passage 1 is adapted from a speech delivered in 1898 by Albert J. Beveridge, “March o
- Section D One of the most impeccable vocations one could pursue is engineering. Engineers,
- 【題組】As used in line “ stewards” most nearly means(A)curators (B) attendants (C)assistants (D)