45. What do critics of Dawkins say about his arguments?
(A) They agree with him.
(B) His arguments are scientific.
(C) Random chance is more improbable than God.
(D) The arguments make no sense.In the exploration of the linguistic life cycle, it is apparent that it is much more difficult tolearn a second language in adulthood than a first language in childhood. Most adults nevercompletely master a foreign language, especially in phonology—hence the ubiquitous foreignaccent. Their development often “fossilizes” into permanent error patterns that no teaching orcorrection can undo. Of course, these are great individual differences, which depend on effort,attitudes, amount of exposure, quality of teaching, and plain talent, but there seems to be a capfor the best adults in the best circumstances.Many explanations have been advanced for children’s superiority: they exploit Motherese(the simplified, repetitive conversation between parents and children), make errorsunself-consciously, are more motivated to communicate, like to conform, are not set in theirways, and have no first language to interfere. But some of these accounts are unlikely, based onwhat is known about how language acquisition works. Recent evidence is calling these social andmotivation explanations into doubt. Holding every other factor constant, a key factor stands out:sheer age.第 8 頁/共 8 頁Systematic evidence comes from the psychologist Elissa Newport and her colleagues.They tested Korean and Chinese-born students at the University of Illinois who had spent at leastten years in the United States. The immigrants were given a list of 276 simple English sentences,half of them containing some grammatical errors. The immigrants who came to the United Statesbetween the age of 3 and 7 performed identically to American-born students. Those who arrivedbetween the age of 8 and 15 did worse the later they arrived, and those who arrived between 17and 39 did the worst of all, and showed huge variability unrelated to their age of arrival.