問題詳情

C.Germany officially unveiled a landmark social-media bill recently that could quickly turn this nation into a test casein the effort to combat the spread of fake news and hate speech in the West. The highly anticipated draft bill is also highlycontentious, with critics denouncing it as a curb on free speech. If passed, as now appears likely, the measure wouldcompel large outlets such as Facebook and Twitter to rapidly remove fake news that incites hate, as well as other “criminal”content, or face fines as high as 50 million euros. Chancellor Angela Merkel’s cabinet agreed on the draft bill Wednesday, giving it a high chance of approval in theGerman Parliament before national elections in September. In effect, the move is Germany’s response to a barrage of fakenews during last year’s elections in the United States, with officials seeking to prevent a similar onslaught here. “The providers of social networks are responsible when their platforms are misused to spread hate crime or illegalfalse news,” German Justice Minister Heiko Maas said in a statement. The proposed law would apply only within Germanborders. But Maas said he would press for similar measures across the European Union. A number of European countries have also sought to counter the fake-news scourge. The Czech Republic recentlyinaugurated a special unit in charge of denouncing false reports. Should the German measure become law, however,experts say it would amount to the boldest step yet by a major Western nation to control social-media content. Dependingon how obviously false or illegal a post is, companies would have as little as 24 hours to remove it. In addition to fake news and hate speech, the draft bill would target posts seen as inciting terrorism or spreading childpornography. Officials have cited a surge of hate speech across the Internet as a major factor behind the rise of far-rightviolence in Germany, including arson attacks at refugee centers and assaults on police officers. Yet the broad nature of the bill prompted critics to call it an overreach that risks becoming de facto censorship. One ofthe companies most affected by the bill is Facebook, which has sought to sidestep such laws by taking voluntary measuresto curb the spread of fake news. The company echoed concerns that the bill would wrongly foist upon corporations a levelof decision-making on the legality of content that should instead reside with German courts.“We work very hard to remove illegal content from our platform and are determined to work with others to solve thisproblem,” the company said in a statement. “As experts have pointed out, this legislation would force private companiesrather than the courts to become the judges of what is illegal in Germany.” But German officials argue that social-mediacompanies are simply not acting quickly enough to deal with damaging posts. Maas cited statistics showing that Facebookhas rapidly deleted just 39 percent of the criminal content it was notified about, while Twitter acted quickly to delete only1 percent of posts cited in user complaints.    Rather than setting a new standard, officials also say they are simply forcing social-media outlets to comply withexisting laws governing hate speech and incitement in Germany. Incitement and defamation laws here are far broader thanin the United States; for instance, laws on the books forbid defaming German leaders and make denial of the Holocaust acrime. “There must be just as little room for illegal hate speech on social networks as there is on the street,” Maas said.“We owe it to the victims of hate crimes to enforce this better.”
46. What is the main idea of this article?
(A) How social media handle fake news and hate speech.
(B) How fake news and hate speech affect American and German elections.
(C) Why social media should take fake news and hate speech seriously.
(D) Why Germany declares war on fake news and hate speech.

參考答案

答案：D
難度：適中0.666667
統計：A(0),B(0),C(2),D(4),E(0)

內容推薦

內容推薦