問題詳情
Part II Reading Comprehension (Skimming and Scanning) (15 minutes) Directions: In this part, you will have 15 minutes to go over the passage quickly and answer the questions on Answer Sheet 1. For questions 1-7, choose the best answer from the four choices marked
(A),
(B),
(C) and
(D). For questions 8-10, complete the sentences with the information given in the passage.Universities Branch Out As never before in their long history, universities have become instruments of national competition as well as instruments of peace. They are the place of the scientific discoveries that move economies forward, and the primary means of educating the talent required to obtain and maintain competitive advantage. But at the same time, the opening of national borders to the flow of goods, services, information and especially people has made universities a powerful force for global integration, mutual understanding and geopolitical stability. In response to the same forces that have driven the world economy, universities have become more self-consciously global: seeking students from around the world who represent the entire range of cultures and values, sending their own students abroad to prepare them for global careers, offering course of study that address the challenges of an interconnected world and collaborative (合作的) research programs to advance science for the benefit of all humanity. Of the forces shaping higher education none is more sweeping than the movement across borders. Over the past three decades the number of students leaving home each year to study abroad has grown at an annual rate of 3.9 percent, from 800,000 in 1975 to 2.5 million in 2004. Most travel from one developed nation to another, but the flow from developing to developed countries is growing rapidly. The reverse flow, from developed to developing countries, is on the rise, too. Today foreign students earn 30 percent of the doctoral degrees awarded in the United States and 38 percent of those in the United Kingdom. And the number crossing borders for undergraduate study is growing as well, to 8 percent of the undergraduates at America’s best institutions and 10 percent of all undergraduates in the U.K. In the United States, 20 percent of the newly hired professors in science and engineering are foreign-born, and in China many newly hired faculty members at the top research universities received their graduate education abroad. Universities are also encouraging students to spend some of their undergraduate years in another country. In Europe, more than 140,000 students participate in the Erasmus program each year, taking courses for credit in one of 2,200 participating institutions across the continent. And in the United States, institutions are helping place students in the summer internships (实习) abroad to prepare them for global careers. Yale and Harvard have led the way, offering every undergraduate at least one international study or internship opportunity—and providing the financial resources to make it possible. Globalization is also reshaping the way research is done. One new trend involves sourcing portions of a research program to another country. Yale professor and Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator Tian Xu directs a research center focused on the genetics of human disease at Shanghai’s Fudan University, in collaboration with faculty colleagues from both schools. The Shanghai center has 95 employees and graduate students working in a 4,300-square-meter laboratory seminars with scientists from both campuses. The arrangement benefits both countries; Xu’s Yale lab is more productive, thanks to the lower costs of conducting research in China, and Chinese graduate students, postdoctors and faculty get on-the-job training from a world-class scientist and his U.S. team. As a result of its strength in science, the United States has consistently led the world in the commercialization of major new technologies, from the mainframe computer and the integrated circuit of the 1960s to the Internet infrastructure (基础设施) and applications software of the 1990s. the link between university-based science and industrial application is often indirect but sometimes highly visible: Silicon Valley was intentionally created by Stanford University, and Route 128 outside Boston has long housed companies spun off from MIT and Harvard. Around the world, governments have encouraged copying of this model, perhaps most successfully in Cambridge, England, where Microsoft and scores of other leading software and biotechnology companies have set up shop around the university. For all its success, the United States remains deeply hesitant about sustaining the research- university model. Most politicians recognize the link between investment in science and national economic strength, but support for research funding has been unsteady. The budget of the National Institutes of Health doubled between 1998 and 2003, but has risen more slowly than inflation since then. Support for the physical sciences and engineering barely kept pace with inflation during that same period. The attempt to make up lost ground is welcome, but the nation would be better served by steady, predictable increases in science funding at the rate of long-term GDP growth, which is on the order of inflation plus 3 percent per year. American politicians have great difficult recognizing that admitting more foreign students can greatly promote the national interest by increasing international understanding. Adjusted for inflation, public funding for international exchanges and foreign-language study is well below the levels of 40 years ago, in the wake of September 11, changes in the visa process caused a dramatic decline in the number of foreign students seeking admission to U.S. universities, and a corresponding surge in enrollments in Australia, Singapore and the U.K. Objections from American university and the business leaders led to improvements in the process and reversal of the decline, but the United States is still seen by many as unwelcoming to international students. Most Americans recognize that universities contribute to the nation’s well-being through their scientific research, but many fear that foreign students threaten American competitiveness by taking their knowledge and skills back home. They fail to grasp that welcoming foreign students to the United States has two important positive effects: first, the very best of them stay in the States and— like immigrants throughout history—strengthen the nation; and second, foreign students who study in the United States become ambassadors for many of its most cherished (珍视) values when they return home. Or at least they understand them better. In America as elsewhere, few instruments of foreign policy are as effective in promoting peace and stability as welcoming international university students.注意:此部分试题在答题卡1上。[!--empirenews.page--]
. From the first paragraph we know that present-day universities have become ________.
(A) more popularized than ever before
(B) in-service training organizations
(C) a powerful force for global integration
(D) more and more research-oriented
(A),
(B),
(C) and
(D). For questions 8-10, complete the sentences with the information given in the passage.Universities Branch Out As never before in their long history, universities have become instruments of national competition as well as instruments of peace. They are the place of the scientific discoveries that move economies forward, and the primary means of educating the talent required to obtain and maintain competitive advantage. But at the same time, the opening of national borders to the flow of goods, services, information and especially people has made universities a powerful force for global integration, mutual understanding and geopolitical stability. In response to the same forces that have driven the world economy, universities have become more self-consciously global: seeking students from around the world who represent the entire range of cultures and values, sending their own students abroad to prepare them for global careers, offering course of study that address the challenges of an interconnected world and collaborative (合作的) research programs to advance science for the benefit of all humanity. Of the forces shaping higher education none is more sweeping than the movement across borders. Over the past three decades the number of students leaving home each year to study abroad has grown at an annual rate of 3.9 percent, from 800,000 in 1975 to 2.5 million in 2004. Most travel from one developed nation to another, but the flow from developing to developed countries is growing rapidly. The reverse flow, from developed to developing countries, is on the rise, too. Today foreign students earn 30 percent of the doctoral degrees awarded in the United States and 38 percent of those in the United Kingdom. And the number crossing borders for undergraduate study is growing as well, to 8 percent of the undergraduates at America’s best institutions and 10 percent of all undergraduates in the U.K. In the United States, 20 percent of the newly hired professors in science and engineering are foreign-born, and in China many newly hired faculty members at the top research universities received their graduate education abroad. Universities are also encouraging students to spend some of their undergraduate years in another country. In Europe, more than 140,000 students participate in the Erasmus program each year, taking courses for credit in one of 2,200 participating institutions across the continent. And in the United States, institutions are helping place students in the summer internships (实习) abroad to prepare them for global careers. Yale and Harvard have led the way, offering every undergraduate at least one international study or internship opportunity—and providing the financial resources to make it possible. Globalization is also reshaping the way research is done. One new trend involves sourcing portions of a research program to another country. Yale professor and Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator Tian Xu directs a research center focused on the genetics of human disease at Shanghai’s Fudan University, in collaboration with faculty colleagues from both schools. The Shanghai center has 95 employees and graduate students working in a 4,300-square-meter laboratory seminars with scientists from both campuses. The arrangement benefits both countries; Xu’s Yale lab is more productive, thanks to the lower costs of conducting research in China, and Chinese graduate students, postdoctors and faculty get on-the-job training from a world-class scientist and his U.S. team. As a result of its strength in science, the United States has consistently led the world in the commercialization of major new technologies, from the mainframe computer and the integrated circuit of the 1960s to the Internet infrastructure (基础设施) and applications software of the 1990s. the link between university-based science and industrial application is often indirect but sometimes highly visible: Silicon Valley was intentionally created by Stanford University, and Route 128 outside Boston has long housed companies spun off from MIT and Harvard. Around the world, governments have encouraged copying of this model, perhaps most successfully in Cambridge, England, where Microsoft and scores of other leading software and biotechnology companies have set up shop around the university. For all its success, the United States remains deeply hesitant about sustaining the research- university model. Most politicians recognize the link between investment in science and national economic strength, but support for research funding has been unsteady. The budget of the National Institutes of Health doubled between 1998 and 2003, but has risen more slowly than inflation since then. Support for the physical sciences and engineering barely kept pace with inflation during that same period. The attempt to make up lost ground is welcome, but the nation would be better served by steady, predictable increases in science funding at the rate of long-term GDP growth, which is on the order of inflation plus 3 percent per year. American politicians have great difficult recognizing that admitting more foreign students can greatly promote the national interest by increasing international understanding. Adjusted for inflation, public funding for international exchanges and foreign-language study is well below the levels of 40 years ago, in the wake of September 11, changes in the visa process caused a dramatic decline in the number of foreign students seeking admission to U.S. universities, and a corresponding surge in enrollments in Australia, Singapore and the U.K. Objections from American university and the business leaders led to improvements in the process and reversal of the decline, but the United States is still seen by many as unwelcoming to international students. Most Americans recognize that universities contribute to the nation’s well-being through their scientific research, but many fear that foreign students threaten American competitiveness by taking their knowledge and skills back home. They fail to grasp that welcoming foreign students to the United States has two important positive effects: first, the very best of them stay in the States and— like immigrants throughout history—strengthen the nation; and second, foreign students who study in the United States become ambassadors for many of its most cherished (珍视) values when they return home. Or at least they understand them better. In America as elsewhere, few instruments of foreign policy are as effective in promoting peace and stability as welcoming international university students.注意:此部分试题在答题卡1上。[!--empirenews.page--]
. From the first paragraph we know that present-day universities have become ________.
(A) more popularized than ever before
(B) in-service training organizations
(C) a powerful force for global integration
(D) more and more research-oriented
參考答案
答案:D
難度:非常困難0
統計:A(0),B(0),C(0),D(0),E(0) #
個人:尚未作答書單:線上學習
內容推薦
- 中国新民主主义革命时期的统一战线包含着两个联盟。其中基本的、主要的联盟是(A) 工人阶级同城市小资产阶级的联盟(B) 以工农联盟为主体的工人阶级同农民、小资产阶级等其他劳动人民的联盟(C) 以工
- 人对物质世界的实践把握是在实践的运行过程中实现的,其基本环节有(A) 区分实践活动的主体与客体 (B) 确立实践目的和实践方案(C) 实践主体依据目的、方案,借助手段作用于客体(D) 完成、
- 3.镰刀型细胞贫血症的病因是血红蛋白基因的碱基序列发生了改变。检测这种碱基序列改变必须使用的酶是 ()(A).解旋酶(B).DNA连接酶(C).限制性内切酶(D).RNA聚合酶
- 坚持以人为本,这是科学发展观的本质和核心。以人为本,就是要把人民的利益作为 一切工作的出发点和落脚点,不断满足人们的多方面需求和促进人的全面发展.具体地说,就是(A) 在经济发展的基础上,不断
- “墙上芦苇,头重脚轻根底浅;山间竹笋,嘴尖皮厚腹中空。”毛泽东在延安整风运 动期间用这幅对联形象地讽刺了(A) 主观主义的学风 (B) 宗派主义的党风(C) 党八股的文风 (D) 官僚主义的作风
- 1948年,中国共产党制定了土地改革总路线。下列选项中对这一总路线所含内容理解正确的有(A) 按照平分土地的原则,满足贫雇农的要求(B) 团结中农,允许中农保有比他人略多的土地(C) 没收地主
- 2005年5月底6月初,歐盟成员国法国和荷兰先后在全民公决中以多数票否决了《歐盟 宪法条约》,这一事件说明(A) 歐盟已失去其吸引力(B) 法、荷两国民众对歐洲一体化建设现状不满(C) 法、荷
- Part Ⅱ Reading Comprehension (Skimming and Scanning) (15 minutes) Directions: In this part, you wil
- 从2003年8月至2004年6月,朝核问题第一、二、三轮六方会谈均在北京举行,中国在解决朝核问题上发挥的作用主要有(A) 提出了和平解决朝核问题的总体目标、方向和途径,并得到广泛认同(B) 推
- 现代企业制度的典型形式是(A) 股份制 (B) 股份 (C) 合伙制 (D) 公司制
內容推薦
- 马克思指出:“一个社会即使探索到本身运动的自然规律,……它还是既不能跳过也 不能用法令取消自然的发展阶段。但是它能缩短和减轻分娩的痛苦。”这表明(A) 人类社会的发展是合规律性与合目的性的统一
- 1939年,毛泽东在《中国革命和中国共产党》中指出,中国是在许多帝国主义国家统 治或半统治下,实际上处于长期的不统一状态,再加上土地扩大,其结果是(A) 帝国主义侵略势力日益成为统治中国的决定
- “三个代表”重要思想深化了对中国特色社会主义的认识,表现在(A) 进一步回答了什么是社会主义,怎样建设社会主义的问题(B) 明确提出了解放思想、实事求是的思想路线(C) 创造性地回答了建设一个
- 2.在光照下,供给玉米离体叶片少量的14CO2,随着光合作用时间的延续,在光合作用固定CO2形成的C3化合物和C4化合物中,14C含量变化示意图正确的是()(A) (B) (C) (D)
- “挟泰山以超北海,语人曰吾不能,是诚不能也。为长者折枝,语人曰吾不能,是不 为也,非不能也。”《孟子》中的这段话启示我们,做事情要区分可能性和不可能性,二者的 区别在于(A)人的主观努力程度 (
- 据报载,北京市××区开展仗文化育文明的洍刨,通过文化资源孕育文明、群众文化 哺育文明、文化兴区培育文明等伙种途径,营造文明城区。这數因为(A) 文化和文明是没有区别的 (B) 文化中的积极成分
- 要实现我国经济发展的战略目标,必须加快经济增长方式的转变,其核心是正确处理好(A) 积累与消费的关系 (B) 投入与产出的关系(C) 速度与效益的关系 (D) 数量与质量的关系
- “计划经济不等于社会主义,资本主义也有计划;市场经济不等于资本主义,社会主 义也有市场”。邓小平这一论断的内涵是(A) 计划和市场都属于社会基本制度的范畴(B) 计划和市场都是资源配置的方式(
- “只有音乐才能激起人的音乐感;对于没有音乐感的耳朵说来,最美的音乐也毫无意 义”。这表明(A) 人的认识是主体与客体相互作用的过程和结果(B) 人的感觉能力决定认识的产生和发展(C) 人的认识能
- 马克思根据人的发展状况把人类历史划分为三大形态。它们是(A) 自然经济社会、商品经济社会、时间经济社会(B) 原始公有制社会、私有制社会、共产主义公有制社会(C) 农业社会、工业社会、信息社会(
- 深圳青年歌手丛飞在8年时间内,捐资上百万元资助很多贫困山区的失学儿童,而自己 却身患癌症,负债17万元。有人这样评价他:“丛飞能够从帮助别人的过程中得到快乐。”丛飞的行为表明(A) 人的价值不
- 影響青少年政治社會化的因子為何?(A)父母(B)同儕(C)大眾傳播媒體(D)以上皆是
- 创新是一个民族进步的灵魂,是一个国家兴旺发达的不竭动力,也是一个政党永葆生 机的源泉。创新包括理论创新、制度创新、技术创新、文化创新及其他各方面的创新。在各项 创新中处于先导地位的是(A) 科
- 中国共产党领导的多党合作和政治协商制度,是我国的一项基本政治制度。多党合作的主要方式有(A) 各民主党派和无党派民主人士参加人大、政协参与管理国家和参政议政(B) 共产党和各民主党派互派成员到
- 列宁说:“意识到自己的奴隶地位而与之作斗争,是革命家;没有意识到自己的奴隶 地位而过着默默无言、浑浑噩噩、忍气吞声的奴隶生活的奴隶,是十足的奴隶。对奴隶生活的 各种好处津津乐道并对和善的好主人感
- 在资本积累过程中,实现个别资本增大的形式是(A) 资本循环 (B) 资本积聚 (C) 资本周转 (D) 资本集中
- 农业、农村和农民问题始终是我国现代化建设的根本性问题,在现代化建设中必须依靠广大农民群众,因为(A) 广大农民是我国现代化事业发展中人数最多的依靠力量(B) 工农联盟是人民民主专政的基础,也是
- 货币的本质是(A) 商品交换的媒介物 (B) 商品价值的一般等价物(C) 商品的等价物 (D) 商品的相对价值形式
- 垄断资本主义的基本经济特征包括(A) 垄断组织在经济生活中起决定作用 (B) 资本输出有了特别重要的意义(C) 在金融资本的基础上形成金融寡头的统治 (D) 垄断使竞争趋于缓和
- 2005年9月15日,国家主席胡锦涛在联合国成立60周年首脑会议上,发表了《努力建设 持久和平、共同繁荣的和谐世界》的讲话,他提出(A) 坚持多边主义,实现共同安全 (B) 坚持互利合作,实现
- 在资本主义社会,农业资本家和土地所有者之间争夺的是(A) 形成级差地租I的超额利润 (B) 形成级差地租II的超额利润(C) 形成绝对地租的超额利润 (D) 形成垄断地租的超额利润
- 作为商品的资本是(A) 商业资本 (B) 借贷资本 (C) 产业资本 (D) 流通资本
- 在中国共产党的历史上,第一次鲜明地提出“马克思主义中国化”的命题和任务的会议是(A) 党的二大 (B) 遵义会议(C) 党的六届六中全会 (D) 党的七大
- 国民革命失败后,毛泽东在八七会议上提出的着名论断是(A) 须知政权是由枪杆子中取得的 (B) 兵民是胜利之本(C) 一切反动派都是纸老虎 (D) 星星之火,可以燎原
- 某地乡村公路边有很多柿子园,金秋时节农民采摘柿子时,最后总要在树上留一些熟 透的柿子。果农们说,这是留给喜鹊的食物。每到冬天,喜鹊都在果树上筑巢过冬,到春天也 不飞走,整天忙着捕捉果树上的虫子